Let Managers Decide: Designing Contracts for Optimal Investment Decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Real options literature commonly assumes that, either the investment opportunity is directly managed by the owners, or the managers are perfectly aligned with them. However, agency conflicts occur and managers reveal interests not totally in line with those of the shareholders. This may have a major impact on the value maximizing decisions, namely, on the optimal timing to invest. This paper contributes to the scarce literature that accounts for agency problems on the exercise of real options. We propose a model which allows to set an optimal contract structure in order to avoid inadequate actions from the manager. In our model, shareholders need not to follow the future evolution of project value drivers in order to guarantee optimal behavior. It is shown that even small deviations from the optimal compensation scheme may lead to highly sub-optimal decisions. Optimal contracts are also established for special situations, namely, to account for impatient managers, for non-proprietary (or non-monopolistic) real options, and also by considering the existence of effort costs for the manager. JEL classification: G31; D82.
منابع مشابه
Duopolistic Investment Opportunities under Agency Risk: Designing Contracts for Optimal Investment Decisions
Real options theory frequently assumes that investment decisions are directly taken by the owners or that, if there is a manager, he is fully aligned with them. However, empirical literature demonstrates that managers may reveal misaligned interests, which may deteriorate the value of the firm, consequently having a major impact on value maximizing decisions, namely, on the optimal timing to in...
متن کاملMoral Hazard, Investment, and Firm Dynamics
We present a dynamic general equilibrium model with heterogeneous rms. Owners of the rms delegate investment decisions to managers, whose consumption and investment decisions are private information. We solve the optimal contracts and characterize the implied general equilibrium. Our calibrated model has implications on the cross-sectional distribution and time-series dynamics of rmsinvestm...
متن کاملOptimal Compensation Contracts with Pay-for- Performance and Termination Incentives
This paper studies optimal compensation contracts in the presence of both payfor-performance and termination incentives. While these incentives have been studied independently, this paper’s model is the first to incorporate both. The primary result is that pay-for-performance and the threat of termination are substitute incentive devices; holding effort constant, optimal pay-for-performance inc...
متن کاملOn relative performance contracts and fund manager’s incentives
For pension schemes, mutual funds, banks and other financial intermediaries, large portfolio decisions are increasingly delegated to fund managers. Recently, there has been growing concern that these managers seem to adopt extremely similar investment strategies. One possible explanation for this phenomenon may be found in reward schemes based on relative performance. We show how relative perfo...
متن کاملWhy Are Bad Products So Hard to Kill?
I is puzzling that firms often continue to invest in product development projects when they should know that demand will be low. We argue that bad products are hard to kill because firms face an inherent conflict when designing managers’ incentives. Rewarding success encourages managers to forge ahead even when demand is low. To avoid investing in low-demand products, the firm must also reward ...
متن کامل